|
|
Baumeister on freewill
Baumeister on freewill
Where
has your willpower gone
Roy Baumeister, Florida State University
New
Scientist, 28 January 2012
INTRODUCTION:
It is quite encouraging to find Baumeister writing on free will or self
control in a popular science magazine, given that as a psychologist, he is a
long way from the mainstream's reliance on a simplistic interpretation of the
Libet experiments. Although the article is given a rather reductionist spin,
stressing that will power is driven by glucose based energy, its arguments are
fatal for the deterministic establishment view as to the non-existence of free
will.
In contrast to the mainstream view that there is no such thing as
free will, with unconscious and deterministic computations responsible for all
human actions and behaviour, Baumeister argues that free will or self control
requires energy, and is therefore part of the physical processing of the brain,
rather than an illusion as the mainstream would have it. P. Baumeister states
that research demonstrates that when subjects have had to exert self control,
they perform poorly on a subsequent test of self control. It is argued that
energy is depleted by the first exercise of self control leaving less available
for the second attempt.
In one such test, subjects were left next to a table
with chocolate biscuits, which they were not supposed to eat. Some of the
subjects succumbed to temptation and ate the biscuits. Subsequently, both the
subjects who had succumbed and those who had resisted attempted a puzzle, which
unbeknown to them was unsolvable. Those who had resisted the biscuit temptation
gave up sooner on the puzzle, suggesting that their mental energy had been
depleted by the effort of resisting temptation.
In this context, will power
is compared to a muscle that can tire, although its full energy can return
after a period of recuperation. Baumeister proposes that the energy driving
will power is ultimately based on glucose that is the basis of
neurotransmitters instructing axons to fire. A meta-analysis performed in 2010
showed that as in the tests mentioned earlier, subjects' performance
deteriorated between a first and second self control test. However subjects
dosed with glucose after the first test performed well on the second test.
|
|