|
|
Flexibility in the brain
Dynamic
coordination in brain and mind
William Phillips, Christoph von der
Malsburg
& Wolf Singer
In:- Dynamic Coordination in the Brain
MIT Press
(2010)
In their preface the authors admit that they are still in the dark as
to how
the brain flexibly applies knowledge and situation awareness to the
achievement
of goals, although dynamic coordination of different and widely
distributed parts
of the brain by means of neural synchronies is viewed as having a role
in this.
Dynamic coordination is seen as dealing with the unpredictable aspects
of the
external world. The unpredictable nature of the external world favours
organisms with brains that are flexible enough to deal with the novel.
This
means that any type of neural code must be reliable, but must also be
able to
sometimes code for different things in differing situations.
Neural activity has a wide
spatial distribution across
the brain, so dynamic coordination is needed to produce responses to
novel
situations. Dynamic coordination cannot be prespecified because the
circumstances that the system has to respond to are unknown until they
arise.
However, even novel patterns of coordination are built up from familiar
components. Neural synchronies could have two messages. Firstly that a
particular feature was present, and secondly that they were
communicating with
other parts of the brain to produce an overall representation. It is
suggested
that there might be an interactive relationship between signal
correlations
changing synaptic strength, and synaptic strengths modulating signal
correlations. The authors think that the coordination dynamics are
distributed
across the brain rather than being an executive function of the
prefrontal.
They also suggest that there may be dynamic coordination within the
prefrontal
cortex made necessary by the different functions of different parts of
the
prefrontal.
Ambiguities
in signals from the external world can be reduced by using the broader
context
of the environment from which the signals come. Dynamic grouping into
subsets
may occur as a result of conscious attention, but can also be
unconscious.
Cognitive functions require flexibility in communication between brain
regions
. NMDA receptors are suggested to mediate coordination within the
cognitive
system. These receptors have a large and
immediate impact on ongoing activity. They amplify what is relevant in
the
current context, and suppress what is not relevant. It is suggested that
their
role in learning might be secondary to their role in processing, because
synaptic changes are a record of amplified patterns of neural activity.
The
authors discuss the role of interneurons and GABA receptors. These are
important in generating and coordinating rhythmic activities. These are
seen as
acting in conjunction with NMDA receptors. Pyramidal cells receive
inhibitory
input from interneurons that temporarily prevents their spiking, after
which
there is a recovery phase. Synchronisation of the inhibitory
interneurons can
in its turn synchronise the phase of recovery. This phase of
synchronised
disinhibition is thought to play a major role in attention and
perception. This
process is particularly effective at gamma frequencies. In terms of
neural
assemblies the rapid formation, change and dissolution of assemblies is
stressed.
The
authors make an analogy with Bayesian techniques. The feed forward
pyramidal
neurons transmit the data to be interpreted, while other neurons carry
information about probabilities that disambiguate perceptions. The
authors
think that a Bayesian approach matches the distinction between initial
input
and modulatory inputs. The latter may be seen as representing prior
information. Synchronisation of neuronal spiking is seen as being
important in
this process. It is suggested that the frequency of spikes and the
synchronisation of the spiking of cells could act in a complimentary
manner.
Studies suggest that synchronisation is important in the segregation of
an
object or figure from its background. Both synchrony and the higher
frequency
beta and gamma rhythms have been connected to learning, attention and
consciousness.
Conscious perception of objects is assisted by
attention, and
synchrony is suggested to play a role in attention, with synchronised
disinhibition playing a role in modulating the context that is to be
dealt
with. Context appears to be important in reducing the ambiguity of a
local
view, such as whether for instance an object is a tent or a book with
its
central ridge uppermost. Thus in object recognition, the process of
recognition
involves not only the features of the object but its relationships in
time and
space, and its relation to stored patterns. One central suggestion in
this book
is that there is a coordination of transmitting and receptivity between
different
brain regions. In discussing executive functions the consensus of the
authors
is that cognitive groupings are important in coordinating other
activities and
are themselves a function of dynamic components.
|
|