|
|
Quantum Evidence 5
1.) Biophysics: Green quantum computer - Scholes G. - Discussion of relation between coherence in photosynthetic protein and neural systems does not appear convincing.
2.) Limits
of quantum speedup in photosynthetic light harvesting - Hoyer, S.,
Sarovar, M.
& Whaley, Birgitta - Argues that quantum coherence in photosynthetic protein is not a search engine, but does increase the efficiency and robustness of energy transport.
1.)
Biophysics:
Green quantum computers
Gregory Scholes, Centre for Quantum Information,
University of Toronto
Nature Physics, 6, 402-403, 2010
In the
photosynthetic systems of plants, algae and bacteria several proteins work
together to convert solar energy. The process of photosynthesis has been
central to the development of life on Earth. The Fenna-Matthews-Olson (FMO)
complex is important in the photosynthetic processing of green sulphur
bacteria. The FMO complex wires energy between two key areas. The first of
these is an antenna for capturing sunlight and transiently storing this energy
in excited chlorophyll molecules. These are described in this article as
'electron waves dancing in the confines of a molecule'. The other key area is a
reaction-centre protein, similar to those also found in purple bacteria. The
energy of photons from the sun is carried through the light harvesting protein
to the seven bacteriochlorophyll molecules that are in each FMO complex before
going to the reaction centre.
Recent experiments suggested that quantum
coherence causes molecules to work collectively, and thus facilitate energy
transfer. Sarovar et al suggested that this system might utilise quantum
entanglement, where a change in the quantum state of one particle affects the
quantum states of others at a distance. Entanglement is suggested to be related
to the extent that excited electrons are delocalised. They predict that this
entanglement persists over most of the life of the excited state. This is also
stated to be true of purple bacteria. It is suggested here that entanglement
might speed up the transfer of energy to the reaction centre, and in particular
avoid trap states that prevent energy reaching the reaction centre.
The
discussion towards the end of the article relative to the possibility that this
type of quantum processing in protein might have implications for brain
processing is perhaps predictably unsatisfactory given the general unpopularity
of this topic, and a suspicion that associations with quantum consciousness
could be a threat to funding. The assumption here appears to be a steam age one,
where the brain has to be interpreted only in terms of large scale components,
as originally described in 19th century science. The main argument
against relevance to brain processing is supposed to be that the photosynthetic
systems described take place on a nanometre scale of size and picosecond scale
of time. However, these are exactly the sort of scales that are relevant to
processing within neurons, making the argument presented here appear irrelevant.
2.)
Limits
of quantum speedup in photosynthetic light harvesting
Hoyer, S., Sarovar, M.
& Whaley, Birgitta
Berkeley Quantum Information and Computation Centre
& Dept. of Physics
arXiv:0910.1847v2 [quant-ph]
This paper deals with
the Fenna-Matthews-Olson (FMO) complex found in green sulphur bacteria. There
have been suggestions that quantum coherence in light-harvesting complexes
supports a speed up in information processing analogous to quantum algorithms.
However, this paper tries to show that the speed up in processing lasts for
only 70 femtoseconds compared to quantum coherence that persists for about 500
femtoseconds.
Recent experiments have shown that there is long-lived quantum
coherence in some photosynthetic systems, and there are suggestions that this
coherence plays a role in the functioning of the system. The FMO complex acts
as a quantum wire transporting excitations from a large disordered antennae complex
to the reaction centre. Recent experimental studies have suggested that quantum
coherence in this system may assist transport along this wire, and add to the
overall efficiency of the system. The FMO complex comprises three identical
sub-units each comprised of seven bacteriochlorophyll molecules in a protein
cage. There are dipolar couplings between the seven chromophore molecules. In
these light-harvesting complexes decoherence results from interactions with the
protein cage, the reaction centre and the surrounding environment. However, it
has been shown that some degree of dephasing or fluctuation of electronic
transition energies increases the efficiency of transport in the FMO complex.
Conclusion: The conclusion of the paper is that quantum speed up requires
both long-lived quantum coherence and excitons delocalised as a wave form
across the entire complex, whether photosynthetic or artificial, as in the case
of a manmade quantum computer. Such completely delocalised excitons do not
exist in the FMO complex, and are thought unlikely to exist in other light
harvesting complexes. The transfer of energy across the FMO complexes is not
viewed by the authors as a quantum search. It is considered more likely that long-lived
quantum coherence contributes to the overall efficiency and robustness, as in
the ability to cope with variations in external conditions. In the LH2 complex
of purple bacteria quantum coherence has been shown to enhance both the speed
and robustness of energy transport.
|
|