|
|
Transcendental ideas & intelligence
Beliefs about consciousness
Imants Baruss
Kings University College, London, Ontario
Journal of Consciousness Studies, 15, No. 10-11, 2008, pp. 277-92
http://ingentaconnect.com/journals/browse/imp/jcs
The
paper comprises a study that relates (1.) the degree to which people
are rational in their approach to the world, (2.) the degree to which
they are curious, and (3.) their score on conventional measures of
intelligence, to three main categories of belief system. These are (1.)
conventional organised religions, (2.) materialism and (3)
transcendental concepts involving mystical experience, altered states of
consciousness and belief in such concepts as ESP and reincarnation.
The
study suggests that those with transcendental beliefs are the most
rational, most curious and open to new ideas and also the most
intelligent of the three groups. This, of course, contradicts the normal
view of the scientific community that only the unintelligent and
deluded are involved with such ideas. It is further suggested that many
in the scientific community are closet transcendentalists, who disguise
these beliefs, for fear of damaging their careers. The study suggests
that the followers of conventional religions are the least rational,
curious or intelligent, with the materialists in the middle position.
Examples
of common transcendental experiences or beliefs encountered by Baruss,
included mystical and out-of-body experiences, belief that the physical
was an extension of the mental, and that consciousness was the ultimate
reality, belief in ESP and reincarnation, in understanding superior to
rational thought, and an emphasis on the inner experiental world,
altered states of consciousness and self-transformation. Perhaps not
surprisingly, when the transcendental group were asked about their
religious affiliations, they tend to classify these as 'own beliefs'.
The importance of consciousness increased across the groups from
materialists to transcendentalists. Materialists tended to regard
consciousness as a by-product of brain processes, for religious
believers it is important, and for transcendalists, it may be viewed as
the ultimate reality.
In tests designed to indicate a person's
interest in rationally understanding the world, there was a correlation
between higher scores and transcendental beliefs. The transcenentalists
scored 50% above those with conventional religious beliefs and one
eighth about the materialists. In tests designed to indicate
appreciation of sensory impression and general openness to experience,
the transcendentalists scored about 10% above religious believers and
about 20% above materialists. Other tests suggested that the
transcendental group had a less 'up tight' approach to life being less
worried about social recognition, risk avoidance or being well
organised. Separate studies of IQ suggested a lower IQ amongst
conventional believers, a middling IQ amongst conventional materialists,
and higher IQs amongst the transcendental group. The authors remark on
the cognitive deficits hypothesis, widespread in the scientific
community, that those with transcendental beliefs are irrational or
stupid. This view claims support from a 1983 study (Tobacyk &
Milford), but this seems to refer more to what might be termed
superstition, such as thinking that 13 is unlucky.
Finally, a
survey of participants in the 1996 Tuscon II 'Towards a science of
consciousness' conference showed a high score for transcendental
beliefs. The author remarks on how little this was reflected in the
relevant published literature. He reminds us that it can be difficult to
pursue academic programmes, obtain tenured positions, receive funding,
publish in mainstream journals or supervise graduate students without
subscribing to the materialist agenda. The discrepancy between the 1996
study and the published literature is taken to suggest that there are a
good number of closet transcendentalists in the scientific community.
|
|